Quick Answer: Do Acts Of Revenge Ever Resolve Conflicts?

Is revenge always justified?

Revenge is self justified.

Someone pushes another, now someone wants to push back, that is justified.

However, if you only want revenge for yourself, you can only barely justify it to others with need for common respect..

Why does Montresor wait 50 years to tell the story?

In “The Cask of Amontillado,” why does Montresor wait fifty years to confess? … That Montresor acknowledges that fifty years have passed since he committed the crime speaks to his pride in having escaped any punishment for what he believes was Fortunato’s well-deserved murder.

Does Montresor feel guilty?

Not only does Montresor feel no guilt, but he perceives his murder of Fortunato as a successful act of vengeance and punishment rather than crime.

What is ironic about the narrator’s conversation with Fortunato once they enter the catacombs?

What is ironic about the narrators conversation with Fortunato once they enter the catacombs? Montresor asked Fortunado if he wanted to leave the catacombs because he was coughing, and Fortunado said no, because he wanted the Amontillado.

Is revenge ever justified in the cask of Amontillado?

In “The Cask of Amontillado,” revenge is not justified. The narrator, Montresor, tells his listener that Fortunato had he had borne…

Is Montresor jealous of Fortunato?

There is no evidence in “Amontillado” that the narrator is at all jealous of Fortunato. In fact, Montressor pays Fortunato his due when he describes him as one of the few Italians who actually possesses a grasp of what constitutes a good wine.

How does Montresor justify his revenge?

The definition of revenge is the act of doing something to hurt someone because that person did something that hurt you. The main character in the story, Montresor, explains his jealousy of Fortunato. To get revenge, he leads the other man to a slow death and seems to feel he is justified in this.

What is the story’s main internal conflict in the cask of Amontillado?

The internal conflict in “The Cask of Amontillado” besets Montresor and may be described as the conflict of character against self, while the external conflict is a subtle one between Montresor and Fortunato and may be described as character against character.

Would the story be better or worse if you knew what Fortunato did to Montresor?

Montresor at first feels alittle bad about what he has done. … The story I think would have been better if we knew what Fortunato did to upset Montresor because we will get a better sense of who really is the bad guy and who isn’t.

Do you believe that Montresor resolve his conflict with Fortunato?

Montresor kills Fortunato, so he gets the revenge he feels he deserves and rids himself of a perceived adversary, but there is no real sense that he resolves his conflict with his enemy. To resolve a conflict would involve, at the least, talking it out, and this never happens.

What happens to Fortunato at the end of the story?

Fortunato is drunk and Montresor is sober while at a carnival. … Fortunato eagerly follows only to be chained to a niche in the wall where he watches as Montresor builds a brick wall to enclose him inside where he will be left to die with no hope of survival or rescue. For a detailed summary, check the link below.

How does Poe create the mood?

A chief way any writer creates mood is through imagery, description that uses the five senses of sight, sound, taste, touch, and smell. Poe was a master of using imagery–often quite imaginatively–to raise a sense of horror. In this story, he uses sight, sound, and touch to create an increasingly terrifying mood.

How does Montresor show his anger toward Fortunato?

The narrator, Montresor, is angry with Fortunato because he feels that Fortunato has injured and insulted him. … ‘” Thus, Fortunato insults the discernment and taste of both Montresor and Luchesi, another locally-respected wine connoisseur.

What is the thesis of The Cask of Amontillado?

What would be a good thesis statement about revenge in “The Cask of Amontillado? Montresor believes that “A wrong is unredressed when retribution overtakes its redresser. In other words, revenge is not truly exacted if the person seeking revenge is punished for it.

Is revenge really worth?

Is it actually worth it to hurt someone who has hurt you, or do you end up feeling worse? … Well, the science is in, and a recent psychology study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology suggests that getting revenge actually does make you feel a lot happier.

Why is revenge a bad thing?

It is inherently unhealthy because it takes a psychological and physical toll on the person. Venting those feelings of anger and hostility does not decrease those feelings,” he said. “It may give you a cathartic feeling, but it doesn’t last.” Revenge spawns an endless cycle of retribution.

Is revenge a good thing?

The answer is that far from an evolutionary mistake, revenge serves a very useful purpose. Michael McCullough puts it this way: although people might say seeking revenge “is really bad for you” – that it might ruin your relationships, for example – the fact that it exists at all is a very good thing.